A new study from Columbia University regarding the jab drops a shocking surprise that the VAERS Deaths are undercounted by a factor of 20. Since the start of the Covid19 jab, the CDC’s VAERS data has been utilized to gather information regarding adverse reactions to the jab and deaths. Currently, VAERS data shows nearly one million adverse reactions and close to 20,000 deaths. The numbers go beyond just a few adverse reactions that the media and political figures portray to the public.
A recent study from Columbia University has found that the numbers being reported from VAERS are inaccurate. The medical consequences and deaths resulting from the jab are grossly underreported.
Below is the abstract from the study:
Accurate estimates of COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse event and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and boosters against SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in different age groups. However, existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced fatality rates (VFR). Here, regional variation in vaccination rates was used to predict all-cause mortality and non-COVID deaths in subsequent time periods using two independent, publicly available datasets from the US and Europe (month-and-week-level resolutions, respectively).
Vaccination correlated negatively with mortality 6-20 weeks post-injection, while vaccination predicted all-cause mortality 0-5 weeks post-injection in almost all age groups and with an age-related temporal pattern consistent with the US vaccine rollout. Results from fitted regression slopes (p<0.05 FDR corrected) suggest a US national average VFR of 0.04% and higher VFR with age (VFR=0.004% in ages 0-17 increasing to 0.06% in ages >75 years) and 146K to 187K vaccine-associated US deaths between February and August 2021. Notably, adult vaccination increased ulterior mortality of unvaccinated young (<18, US; <15, Europe).
Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias. Comparing our age-stratified VFRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults, and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure. We discuss implications for public health policies related to boosters, school and workplace mandates, and the urgent need to identify, develop and disseminate diagnostics and treatments for life-altering vaccine injuries.
The study was conducted by individuals who are for the jab. However, they are concerned that the jab has been pushed on the world at an accelerated rate without proper testing to ensure the efficacy and safety of the jab. Most medical community members refuse to admit how dangerous the jab can be due to the lack of proper testing and continue to push patients into getting it. Many people trust the information they hear, thinking they are protecting themselves when they are potentially putting themselves at higher risks.
The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a “vaccine.” According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it’s intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.