Democrat strategist James Carville delivered a rather unhinged take on his podcast earlier in February, directing ire toward those who haven’t taken the COVID shots and saying he’d like to punch them in the face.
On the February 3rd installment of “Politics War Room with James Carville & Al Hunt”, the 77-year-old political consultant and his cohost Hunt took a listener’s question on why President Biden wouldn’t pass a bill prohibiting the unjabbed from interstate travel.
Hunt chimed in first, saying that he wouldn’t be against such an effort so long as there was a testing option, but pointed out that the Supreme Court likely wouldn’t let it ride anyway.
“I wouldn’t be against that at all. I’d be for it actually, as long as you put ‘or testing.’ Before you get on a plane or bus or interstate train, you want to be vaccinated or tested. I don’t think the Supreme Court would allow him to do that.”
Carville concurred with Hunt, saying he too didn’t believe the Supreme Court would allow a bill like that to come to fruition.
However, while Carville and Hunt agreed that no such law would likely ever see the light of day, Carville then segued to him championing the idea of a law that would allow people to physically attack – with impunity – those who’ve gone unjabbed.
“I wish what they’d do is pass a law to make you immune from liability if you punch some unvaccinated person right in the face, which I’d really like to do.
If you ask me what’s my first reaction to you if you’re not vaccinated, you don’t have any medical reason not to be, you’re a piece of shit, okay? I just want to punch you in the goddammed face. That’s the way I look at these people.”
Hunt replied, “agreed” with respect to Carville’s clamoring about using violence against those who’ve opted to remain unjabbed.
The heated rhetoric of this sort against those who haven’t taken the COVID jab has been increasing over the past few months – with slights even coming from the White House back in December when Biden claimed the unjabbed would face a “winter of severe illness and death.”
Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a “vaccine.” According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it’s intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.